Dispatch: Anti-Obesity Campaign Grows Fat While Anti-Tobacco Funds Reduced To A Puff

By ACSH Staff — Jul 28, 2010
The front page of today’s New York Times business section features a topic ACSH addressed on July 9th — the transfer of anti-smoking funding toward anti-obesity efforts.

The front page of today’s New York Times business section features a topic ACSH addressed on July 9th — the transfer of anti-smoking funding toward anti-obesity efforts. In the article, NYT columnist Duff Wilson highlights the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), a well-endowed private foundation that had taken on anti-smoking education as one of its core missions in the 1990s (in fact, ACSH received a 1998 grant from RWJF to research and publish a report). Of late, the foundation has refocused its mission onto the fight against childhood obesity.

ACSH staffers wonder why such organizations have chosen to divert funds from anti-smoking efforts even though, according to smoking researcher Dr. Stanton Glantz, “tobacco kills four times as many [Americans] as obesity does.” ACSH's Dr. Elizabeth Whelan believes that their shift in funding priorities is because childhood obesity is the “new kid on the block receiving all of the attention” — and also because of Michelle Obama’s childhood obesity campaign, adds ACSH's Dr. Gilbert Ross.

Category
ACSH relies on donors like you. If you enjoy our work, please contribute.

Make your tax-deductible gift today!

 

 

Popular articles