Daft FDA Policy is Adding to the Homelessness Crisis. Here's Why

By Jeff Singer, M.D. and Josh Bloom, Ph.D

A recent study found two-thirds of homeless people have a mental illness, with more than three-quarters of them having experienced it during their lifetimes. Between 10 and 20 percent of the homeless have schizophrenia, one of the most debilitating of all mental health disorders. For people with such a severe condition, it is crucial that they have easy access to effective antipsychotic medications.

Unfortunately, an FDA policy — specifically the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) program — has been largely responsible for the underprescription and underuse of clozapine, the only FDA-approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, the most severe form of the disorder.

The FDA established REMS in 2007 to ensure safety precautions for certain drugs with potentially dangerous side effects. While ensuring drug safety is essential, the REMS program has unintentionally created barriers that disproportionately affect individuals with severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia, further compounding the significant challenges they already face, including unemployment, substance abuse, heightened suicide risk and homelessness.

Tragic stories abound of stable patients who lost access to clozapine and had catastrophic relapses. Kevin Keith Langemeier missed the REMS window to refill his clozapine prescription, leading to delusions that caused him to brandish a toy rifle at police, who then shot and killed him. Andrew M.’s delusions and threatening voices returned when he was cut off from clozapine after missing a routine blood test. He pulled out his right eye with his fingers and even managed to sever the optic nerve.

The FDA approved clozapine, which is classified as an “atypical” antipsychotic drug, for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in 1990. In 2002, the FDA announced clozapine was effective in reducing the risk of suicide in people with schizophrenia and associated disorders. Atypical antipsychotics are preferred over so-called “typical” antipsychotics due to fewer movement-related side effects, like tremors, stiffness, uncontrollable muscle movements (“tardive dyskinesia”) and restlessness. A 2024 Brazilian study found patients taking non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics had a 21 percent greater chance of death than those taking clozapine. The World Health Organization includes clozapine on its List of Essential Medicines.

Clozapine was included in the REMS program in 2015 because of a rare side effect (less than 3 percent frequency) called agranulocytosis, a reversible but life-threatening drop in the white blood cell count. We believe this policy is overly cautious since the risk of agranulocytosis drops sharply within months of beginning treatment while the risk of untreated patients falling through the cracks, unable or unwilling to go for weekly REMS-mandated blood tests, is considerable. Furthermore, research shows that, within a year, the risk of blood abnormalities caused by clozapine is similar to that of other antipsychotic drugs for which no weekly blood tests are required.

It is now 34 years since the FDA approved this essential antipsychotic drug. Yet the agency still requires all prescribers to enroll and be certified in the Clozapine REMS program, all pharmacists who dispense it to be Clozapine REMS-certified, and all Clozapine patients to enroll in the program.

The Clozapine REMS mandates regular lab tests for people taking the drug, with results reviewed by the prescriber and pharmacy before patients receive a seven-day supply. These requirements, burdensome even for healthy people, have discouraged doctors from prescribing, pharmacies from dispensing and patients from obtaining clozapine.

#This article originally appeared on The Hill website.

With an estimated 30 percent of schizophrenic patients not responding to first-line antipsychotic drugs, it is a travesty that clozapine is only prescribed to 4 percent of schizophrenic patients in the U.S.

Government-imposed REMS programs are unnecessary. After the FDA approves a drug for marketing, it requires drug makers to monitor it for unforeseen long-term risks. Concerns about reputation and liability are other motivators. Furthermore, when doctors prescribe medications that may have serious side effects, they, too, monitor their patients — it’s malpractice not to do so.

For example, widely prescribed statin drugs can cause liver abnormalities in some patients. Doctors routinely check for this, especially in statin-naïve patients, and then relax surveillance as circumstances warrant. Doctors frequently prescribe drugs that can cause severe blood abnormalities for a variety of conditions. These include other antipsychotic drugs such as Seroquel, which, unlike clozapine, is unconstrained by a regimented, complex, top-down program overseen by a federal bureaucracy.