June 8, 2004 A broad range of groups, from landlords to the non-profit Community Preservation Corp., went to court last week to stop the city's new lead-paint law.
Here's hoping Judge Louis York grants the injunction before the law goes into effect Aug. 2 because the law would make it harder for all New Yorkers to get housing.
It's already deterring investment in affordable housing, a reality that will leave more of New York's 40,000-plus homeless in shelters.
Why would the City Council pass a law to increase homelessness?
Search results
For over twenty years, eggs have been considered dietary demons by many because of their high cholesterol content. Since high levels of cholesterol in the blood have been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, the thinking was that limiting dietary cholesterol by limiting egg consumption would be a step in the right direction. Current dietary recommendations are to restrict cholesterol intake to 300 milligrams per day one large egg yolk contains about 213 milligrams to decrease the risk of heart disease.
In the category of facts that "everyone knows" is the assumption that organic foods (mostly produce) are better for people's health than the same items produced by conventional means. According to a recent article from CNN, a number of schools are now providing children with salad bars consisting of organic foods and are patting themselves on the back about giving the kids more healthful foods.
For several years, ACSH has been warning consumers that "natural" products such as herbal supplements are neither well regulated nor intrinsically safe. In our publication on potential supplement-drug interactions as well as on this site, we have noted actual and potential problems with such products.
Who was quoted in a Sunday newspaper trying to reassure people by saying the following?
"The key thing to remember is that all the products are well within the set safety limits and they are absolutely safe."
A) The spokesperson for a pesticide trade association.B) The spokesperson for a chemical company.C) The spokesperson for an organic food company.D) The spokesperson for a major multinational food company.
This past weekend -- a few days after ACSH's annual staff party at the beach -- I took a car service back to New York. It was relatively early Sunday morning, but the Garden State Parkway was packed -- although traffic was moving. We were not on the parkway more than thirty minutes when I saw an alarming site: three deer feeding on the grass, inching closer to the highway, apparently ready to sprint into moving traffic. Over the years, we have seen deer on the parkway before -- but never in a cluster, and never so close to moving cars.
I offer full disclosure right up front: I love FoxNews. It is my favorite channel. Other than a brief peek at NBC's Today show at 7am each day, FoxNews is the only channel I watch. I find them to be, as their logo brags, "fair and balanced." It seems that many other Americans agree with me: FoxNews is frequently cited as being #1 in national viewership of cable news channels.
But despite my great allegiance to Fox, I think there is room for improvement at that network. A lot of room.
The credibility of the peer review process has come under vehement attack.
Scientists who receive no-strings-attached financial support for their research from demonized industries -- tobacco, pharmaceuticals, and food, among others -- are no longer deemed trustworthy.
Fortunately, Julia Child was honored in life as she is now being honored in death. She was rightly known for her TV cooking shows, her fabulous cookbooks, and her magnificent sense of humor. To some, mass culture is an oxymoron, to which we can add another, equally threatening, oxymoron: democratic elitism. For that is a defining characteristic of Julia Child's life; she democratized what had been the historic province and exclusive privilege of a tiny elite. In fact, today in our cuisine as well as our daily life, we enjoy much that even elites of prior times never experienced.
Two stories appeared in the news recently that tried create alarm about modern therapeutic methods -- but had the opposite effect on me, and should on you too.
That's the paradox noted in a June 30 article by J.M. Hirsch, but he also notes:
Ruth Kava of the American Council of Science and Health said recently that data such as these indicate that despite a flood of nutrition advice, people may actually understand very little about healthy eating.
CBS 2's Cindy Hsu reports many dentists are now selling a retainer that helps people eat less and quotes ACSH's Dr. Ruth Kava:
"This device, if it slows people down, makes them take smaller bites. It could help," says Dr. Ruth Kava from the American Council on Science and Health.
But Dr. Kava says you don't need to spend big bucks on wiring your mouth shut.
Readers of ACSH's website know that we have been skeptical for years about the value of antioxidant supplements for the treatment or prevention of various diseases like cancer or heart disease (see pieces here, here, and here).
August 9, 2004 marked the third anniversary of President Bush's decision to limit federal funding of embryonic stem cell (ESC) research to cell lines created before August 2001. On this anniversary, First Lady Laura Bush defended her husband's policy and suggested that his opponents, including Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry and members of former President Reagan's family, have overstated the benefits of such research.
For years now, scaremongers have been trying to frighten consumers with the specter of so-called "Frankenfoods," especially food plants altered by gene-splicing to include pesticide resistance or higher levels of particular nutrients. Several years ago, for example, alarmist groups raised the fear that a protein added to StarLink corn would cause fatal allergic reactions in consumers. It didn't happen. But that hasn't stopped such accusations from getting much media play and causing some consumers to mistrust the latest methodologies.
You may recall hearing recently that the scare about French fries and cancer was nothing to worry about after all. This March 11 article explains why we shouldn't worry about the low levels of acrylamide we consume in foods. Not bad, given that ACSH's peer-reviewed report saying the same came out in February 2002.
Here at the American Council on Science and Health, we're releasing the fourth edition of our handy tome Facts Versus Fears (which inspired the name of our website, FactsAndFears). The booklet surveys the greatest unfounded health scares of the past five decades, from the "Cranberry Scare" of 1959 to current paranoia over PCBs in farmed salmon and thimerosal in vaccines. In between, scares have occurred with great regularity -- and precious little scientific evidence to justify them.
Dr. Siegel has given permission for us to reprint this important letter he posted to the Tp-Talk discussion group about tensions within the anti-smoking movement and apparent tensions among the stated goals of the American Legacy Foundation, which was created with money from the Master Settlement Agreement between government and tobacco companies, to educate the public about the dangers of cigarettes:
An October 4, 2004 article in Brandweek by Sonia Reyes (mis)quoted (and misspelled) Dr. Ruth Kava from ACSH, but we appreciate the attention anyway. The piece noted that cereal makers are including more fiber in their products and aren't yet sure if kids will take to it:
Nonetheless, Ruth Cava, director of nutrition at the American Council on Science and Health, a non-profit public health group in New York, was impressed with the switch. "Whole grains has been a niche that Big G is now bringing mainstream," she said.
"Take a deep breath: this is not an emergency," Dr. Julie Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention told Americans Wednesday. She was, of course, referring to the stunning announcement Tuesday that United Kingdom regulators had suspended operations at a Liverpool plant, halting production of some 50 million doses of influenza vaccine that were to provide protection for Americans during the upcoming flu season.
The recent withdrawal of Merck's blockbuster COX-2 inhibitor, the anti-arthritis pain reliever Vioxx (rofecoxib), was a major blow to a number of interested parties. Merck, of course, took the biggest hit. But the millions of arthritis sufferers who depended on reliable and safe relief from pain since Vioxx's approval in 1999 are also confused and upset, and the federal drug regulators at the FDA are in the midst of a losing streak of unprecedented proportions.
This letter in Nature 432, 15 (November 4, 2004) was a response to one from Consumers Union employees that criticized a symposium on organic foods organized by ACSH Advisor and Rutgers professor Joseph Rosen. ACSH Nutrition Director Dr. Ruth Kava was one of the presenters at the symposium. As usual, the critics couldn't fault the science, so they attacked ACSH's funding.
Industry Funding Doesn't Influence Our Reports
Sir--
Fox News network's The Big Story with John Gibson interviewed ACSH's Dr. Elizabeth Whelan on October 12, 2004:
HEATHER NAUERT, FOX NEWS: It looks like about as many as 35 million people are unlikely to get a flu shot this season. The government is now rationing the vaccine, trying to get shots to those who are considered to be most vulnerable: those are children and the elderly primarily.
"Despite all the controversy about diet...a calorie is a calorie is a calorie."
--Dr. Ernst Schaefer of Tufts University in Boston, who led a study that found that restricting certain food groups is not an effective weight loss approach, as quoted November 9 by Reuters.
"It's the world's first significant health treaty. It's a moment we hope will change global health."
Denis Aitken, World Health Organization1
Pagination
ACSH relies on donors like you. If you enjoy our work, please contribute.
Make your tax-deductible gift today!